Director Liability for Climate Reporting in Australia
Last updated: April 2026
Key Takeaways
- Two directors must personally sign a declaration (s296A) confirming the sustainability report complies with AASB S2
- Corporate penalties up to $16.5 million or 10% of turnover. ASIC has already pursued $10M+ greenwashing fines
- A modified safe harbour protects good-faith disclosures in Years 1–3 — but it expires, and full liability applies from Year 4
- Taking reasonable steps now — governance, proper systems, qualified advice, assurance — is the best protection
The Legal Framework
AASB S2 mandatory climate reporting was legislated through amendments to the Corporations Act 2001. This means climate disclosures carry the same legal weight as financial reporting. The key provisions are:
- Section 292A: Requires reporting entities to prepare a sustainability report as part of their annual reporting
- Section 296A: Requires a directors' declaration — two directors must sign off that the sustainability report complies with AASB S2
- Sections 1707C–1707D: The modified liability safe harbour for Years 1–3
- Existing penalties: The Corporations Act's existing penalty framework for misleading disclosures, non-compliance, and false statements applies to sustainability reports
The Directors' Declaration (s296A)
Just as directors sign off on the financial statements, s296A requires at least two directors to declare that:
- The sustainability report complies with AASB S2 (and AASB S1 where applicable)
- The report complies with the relevant provisions of the Corporations Act
- There are reasonable grounds to believe the entity will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due (if relevant)
This declaration creates personal accountability. The signing directors are putting their name — and their liability — behind the accuracy and compliance of the report.
Board members who sign should satisfy themselves that:
- The emissions data is sourced from reliable systems with an audit trail
- Appropriate emission factors have been used (NGA 2025 for Australian operations)
- Governance disclosures accurately reflect actual board processes
- The report has been reviewed by qualified internal or external advisors
- Limited assurance has been obtained (required from Year 1)
Penalties and Enforcement
Corporate Penalties
| Offence | Maximum penalty |
|---|---|
| Failure to prepare sustainability report | $16.5M or 10% of turnover |
| Misleading climate disclosures | $16.5M or 10% of turnover |
| Failure to obtain required assurance | $16.5M or 10% of turnover |
| False directors' declaration | Personal liability for signing directors |
ASIC Enforcement Track Record
ASIC has demonstrated willingness to enforce climate and ESG-related obligations:
- Active Super (2024): $10.5 million penalty for misleading ESG and sustainability claims about investment screening
- Mercer Super (2024): $11.3 million penalty for greenwashing — making misleading claims about the sustainability of investment options
- Vanguard (2024): $12.9 million penalty for misleading ESG screening claims
These cases involved voluntary ESG claims. AASB S2 disclosures are mandatory — the enforcement bar will be even clearer.
The Modified Safe Harbour (ss1707C–1707D)
Recognising that climate reporting is new and complex, the legislation includes a modified liability safe harbour for the first three reporting years:
What It Protects
- Good-faith disclosures made with reasonable care and diligence
- Errors or inaccuracies that result from genuine uncertainty (e.g., Scope 3 estimates, scenario projections)
- Forward-looking statements made on a reasonable basis
What It Does NOT Protect
- Knowingly false or misleading statements
- Reckless disregard for accuracy
- Fraudulent disclosures
- Complete failure to report when required
Timeline
| Group | Safe harbour applies | Full liability from |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | FY2025–26 to FY2027–28 | FY2028–29 |
| Group 2 | FY2026–27 to FY2028–29 | FY2029–30 |
| Group 3 | FY2027–28 to FY2029–30 | FY2030–31 |
The safe harbour is not an excuse to do a poor job — it is protection for those who make genuine, good-faith efforts. Use the safe harbour years to build robust processes that will stand up under full liability.
What "Reasonable Steps" Looks Like in Practice
A director who can demonstrate they took reasonable steps will be in a much stronger position if disclosures are later questioned. Here is what reasonable steps look like:
- Establish climate governance: Assign board responsibility, define committee terms of reference, set review frequency. Document everything
- Use proper systems: Use auditable carbon accounting software, not spreadsheets. Ensure there is a complete data trail from source documents to final report
- Engage qualified people: Whether internal sustainability staff or external advisors, ensure those preparing the report understand AASB S2 requirements and emission factor methodology
- Obtain assurance early: Engage an assurance provider before the report is finalised. Year 1 requires limited assurance on governance and Scope 1 & 2 emissions
- Stay informed: Directors should understand the basics of AASB S2, what is being disclosed, and the methodology used. You don't need to be a climate scientist, but you need to understand the report you are signing
- Document decisions: Record board discussions about climate risks, methodology choices, and materiality assessments. If challenged later, you want evidence of deliberate, informed decision-making
- Review and challenge: Don't just rubber-stamp the report. Ask questions about data quality, boundary completeness, and key assumptions. The directors' declaration requires you to be satisfied the report is compliant
Board Action Plan
Confirm your reporting group and timeline
Check if you meet Group 2 (July 2026) or Group 3 (July 2027) thresholds
Assign board-level climate governance
Designate a committee, update terms of reference, set meeting cadence
Implement carbon accounting systems
Move from spreadsheets to auditable software with verified emission factors
Engage assurance provider
Limited assurance required from Year 1 — providers are in high demand
Build internal capability
Train relevant staff on AASB S2 requirements and data collection processes
Review before signing s296A
Directors must understand and be satisfied with the report before declaring compliance
Frequently Asked Questions
Can directors go to jail for incorrect climate reporting?
What is the directors' declaration under s296A?
What does the modified safe harbour protect against?
How is ASIC enforcing climate reporting?
What happens when the safe harbour expires?
What are 'reasonable steps' a director should take?
Demonstrate reasonable steps with auditable reporting
Emisso provides verified emission factors, full audit trails, and AASB S2-structured reports — giving directors confidence in the data they are signing off on.